The Story Of Crossfit
Imagine this, you’re sitting on the
couch, having a glass of wine, watching your favorite TV show, feeling
great. Then out of nowhere your heart
starts to hammer in your chest, making you start to worry. Your heart rate skyrockets and your vision
starts to go blurry. Before you know it
you wake up a few minutes later laying on your side with a sheen of sweat
covering your body, knowing that you’ve just had an “episode.” This is what 3
million people in America have to deal with on a daily basis. This is called POTS. The effects of POTS gets better with everyday
exercise but only with the right kind of exercise. Crossfit gives the people
with POTS the right kind of exercise that is needed to help with this incurable
disorder. Crossfit gives people with
POTS their life back.
Let me be clear when I say that
Crossfit doesn’t hurt people, it saves them.
The people that go into a gym for the first time, with none to little
physical exercising previously, and think that they can just do everything
listed in a class, will in turn hurt themselves. These are the people that give Crossfit a bad
name. With the right techniques and
coaching you will not only succeed in the sport but go far beyond what you thought
you could accomplish before you started.
The sport of Crossfit has become
increasingly more popular in this day and age.
With the sport getting started in 2000, stated by the Crossfit website, and
not really gaining attention or speed until 2007-2008, you can absolutely say
this is a new way to exercise. The attention started to happen in once social
media was introduced and affiliates started appearing in more places. Currently,
on the Crossfit website (map.crossfit.com)
it states that there are gyms located in 142 countries, 7 continents and
more than 10,000 affiliates. Now why
would there be so many locations if all that Crossfit does is hurt people? Dave
Castro, the founder of Crossfit, and everything that falls under the Crossfit
names, wanted this to be a worldwide phenomena which it has turned into the
past couple of years.
Facts show, on the National
Institute of Health (NCBI) that of the top three most popular ways to exercise, high
intensity interval training, (HIIT) is one of them and is one of the main ways
that Crossfit pursues exercise. HIIT
isn’t just used in boxes Crossfit gyms, it’s also used for training in sports
like in training for things like, football, soccer, and boxing, to create a
realm of idea of what a high heart rate should look like. This is what people’s
concerns are when revolving around Crossfit.
People against Crossfit often say say that there isn’t enough time
between intervals for “adequate” rest along with improper training. When
studies actually show that, “High-intensity functional training programs,
including Crossfit, have similar or lower potential for injury than traditional
physical training activities. (NCBI)” If this is a good way for people to gain physical
exercise why is there so much backlash?
While researching on the National
Institute of Health I saw an article under related information titled, “Bias
due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic
reviews of randomized trials of healthcare interventions. (NCBI Article II)” Why is this important you ask? Well first off one of the first things the
research paper states is, “Systematic reviews may be compromised by selective
inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses.” This in layman’s terms is basically saying
that reviews can be messed up by only including certain data, thus creating a
false idea of the subject being talked about. Now the article itself is not
particularly talking about Crossfit but does point out how there are many
studies that are concluded based off of only the data the person wants to
portray, not the overall aspect. If
people are only basing their bias off of articles that aren’t true, then
wouldn’t their beliefs be falsified?
Crossfit is an extreme sport that
people of all shapes and sizes can participate in. It doesn’t just create athletes but better individuals. Through researched facts any person can see
how Crossfit can affect someone’s day to day life and how it can create not
just a better lifestyle but a better way of living. The people that don’t know
their facts are the ones that create the bad name for the sport, and keep
millions of others from finding their true potential. As the years go by, I know that Crossfit will
gain more popularity and will be shown in a better light. This will not only benefit people personally
but benefit our entire species as a whole.
Works
Cited:
Claudino, João Gustavo, Tim J.
Gabbett, Frank Bourgeois, Helton De Sá Souza, Rafael Chagas Miranda, Bruno
Mezêncio, Rafael Soncin, Carlos Alberto Cardoso Filho, Martim Bottaro, Arnaldo
Jose Hernandez, Alberto Carlos Amadio, and Julio Cerca Serrão. Current
Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. U.S. National Library of Medicine, Dec.
2018. Web.
Page, M J, J E McKenzie, J. Kirkham,
K. Dwan, S. Kramer, S. Green, and A. Forbes. "Bias Due to Selective
Inclusion and Reporting of Outcomes and Analyses in Systematic Reviews of
Randomised Trials of Healthcare Interventions." Current Neurology and
Neuroscience Reports. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 01 Oct. 2014. Web.
18 Sept. 2018.
"View
More." CrossFit Exercises & Demos. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Sept.
2018.
Kayla,
ReplyDeleteDecent start here! I'd say first things first, you've got to define POTS before you start using it as an acronym.
I'm not sure your second paragraph really does anything for your paper, as its essentially the entire argument that you are making. As a paragraph, it's not specifically doing any work.
You must move away from this:
Facts show, on the National Institute of Health (NCBI) that of the top three most popular ways to exercise, high intensity interval training, (HIIT) is one of them and is one of the main ways that Crossfit pursues exercise.
You could start that with "The National Institute of Health shows..."then state your fact. You also use the "I" voice and it detracts from you argument.
What's setting this piece back a bit is that you try to fit in perhaps too much in a large berth of a topic. I think this piece could be narrowed only be about POTS or to be about dispelling people's views on the harmful effects of crossfit. These may seem narrow, but narrow is what really makes you dial in your argument, even with the same facts.
Additionally, you must watch sweeping claims. Crossfit helping our "species" makes your argument soooooo so broad, and I'm not sure a piece of this length is prepared to take on the gravity of such. For example, if it's so good as it should help our species, should governments then make it mandatory? I recognize that it's easy to go here, but in pieces like this, every sentence counts, and if this is not explicitly involved in your central claim, then be cautious. Good work, but let's keep going!
-Brandon